Oxfam’s falsity

Screen Shot 2014-04-07 at 03.38.39A bogus charity that appeals to envy and hatred

Oxfam, the state-funded faux-charity, has played an important part, among other things, in ruining large numbers of secondhand bookshops and other simple honest businesses.

Moreover it actively promotes, writes Dalrymple,

the single most disastrous economic idea of all time, that the economy is a cake and a slice for me means crumbs for you.

Oxfam speaks

as from the moral high ground, but…is far from morally unimpeachable….The group’s self-presentation is grossly dishonest.

The bogus charity raised, in a year, £118.5 million by voluntary donations, but spent £101.8 million during the year on staff salaries.

Since the Oxfam website shows a picture of happy, smiling, formerly impoverished people saved from their misery by Oxfam, I doubt that paying the salaries of staff is what most contributors had in mind when they dropped their coins into the rattling tins. Suggestio falsi, suppressio veri comes to mind.

Charity is no longer charity

Dalrymple draws attention to the single most important fact about Oxfam, that

the majority of its money comes from government…from the forced contributions of taxpayers in various countries.

Such funds amounted to £170.1 million as against £118.5 million genuinely charitable contributions.

An organisation so financially dependent upon forced contributions cannot be called a charity at all.

And the staff of this parody of a charity are, of course, very far from egalitarian where their own income is concerned.

There are three staff in Oxfam paid between $166,000 and $182,000 a year….such a salary represents considerably more than a living wage, which is the most that one would expect a true charitable worker to earn. What’s more, Oxfam runs a defined-benefit pension scheme, of which most workers today can now only dream. The chief executive incurred $80,000 in expenses in 2013. I doubt that the average donor, thinking of the relief of starving babies with flies on their eyelids, is aware of this as he makes his contribution.


systematically misleads its own volunteers….it peddles false impressions….If ever the argument tu quoque were justified, it is here. Oxfam promotes highly contentious views on the one hand and is less than scrupulous in its dealings with its own supporters on the other.


Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.


  • SalvaVenia  On April 7, 2014 at 23:26

    Oxfam, always a pain in your a…, if you have to play these guys during disaster operations. They evidently follow their own racist agenda.

  • wegzorn  On February 13, 2018 at 02:17

    I created the following animation based on Theodore Dalrymple’s essay on Oxfam.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: