The perpetrator of the Nice outrage, Dalrymple relates,
was born and raised in Tunisia and, a totally unskilled man, was given leave to enter and stay in France because he had married a French citizen of Tunisian origin in Tunisia. The decision to allow him into France was based on an abstract doctrine of human rights—in this instance, the right to family reunification—rather than on France’s national interest, which is never allowed to enter into such decisions.
was very violent to his wife and she divorced him, but it was impossible to deport this père de famille, for to do so would have been contrary to his children’s right to a father. His children therefore acted as his permis de séjour, which was renewed when the original ran out.
Trivial little offences
The public prosecutor of Paris
described him as a petit délinquant, though his offences included damage to property, robbery, making threats and repeated acts of violence.
He hit a man
with a baseball bat (which he happened to have with him, though baseball is not played in France) because the man asked him to move his van, which was blocking traffic.
He was sentenced to six months in prison. The sentence was suspended. Dalrymple asks:
Is a state that cannot bring itself to punish a man who attacks another with a baseball bat one with the will to thwart terrorism?