Freudulent poseur

The work of Sigmund Freud, writes Dalrymple, is

more like soothsaying than science.

This, he says, explains its popularity in the 20th century,

with its need for pagan mystics masquerading as rationalists.

Neither the plausibility nor the persuasiveness of Freud’s speculations

accounts for his influence on so many intelligent and well-educated people for so long; rather it was the convoluted implausibility of his speculations that attracted them. We like to be in on a secret not comprehensible to others.

Advertisements
Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a comment.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: