Very obviously, more of a liability than an asset

Sharing the burden, not the assets

Whatever attitude governments take to undocumented migrants, writes Dalrymple,

no one truly believes that they are more of an asset than a liability.

Madrid’s decision to take a vessel carrying 629 African migrants

was taken on ‘humanitarian’ grounds, rather than because it believed that Spain would benefit from the migrants’ presence. When European leaders discuss the migrant question, it is in terms of sharing the burden, not the assets. No one speaks of foreign investment in this way, which suggests that European politicians believe that the free movement of people and capital are different in an important way.

Certain European leaders, Dalrymple notes,

are incensed when countries such as Hungary and Poland refuse point-blank to take any migrants from Africa or the Middle East. But I have never seen mentioned in this context the question of where the migrants themselves want to go. They might as well be inanimate toxic waste as far as the discussion is concerned, rather than human beings with wishes, desires, ambitions. They are but pawns in a political game.

Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a comment.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: